<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charter Schools: More Attacks, More Misunderstanding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://indianachamberblogs.com/index.php/government/charter-schools-more-attacks-more-misunderstanding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://indianachamberblogs.com/government/charter-schools-more-attacks-more-misunderstanding/</link>
	<description>The Business Blog of the Indiana Chamber of Commerce</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 12:53:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Gromer</title>
		<link>http://indianachamberblogs.com/government/charter-schools-more-attacks-more-misunderstanding/#comment-1972</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Gromer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://indianachamberblogs.com/?p=407#comment-1972</guid>
		<description>I remember a few years ago the NEA was touting a University of Illinois study that showed there was no difference in test scores between public and parochial schools. As I was investing heavily on an erroneous assumption, I decided to investigate. As I recall, the original findings used an increase factor of 1.8 for public schools and they still didn't measure up. I guess someone on the team did not like the results so they increased the multiplier to 2.5. Guess what, now they were the same. Take out the factor and public schools grossly underperformed. Could be the same research rubric is afoot in CEEP? I ain't sayin, just pointing fingers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember a few years ago the NEA was touting a University of Illinois study that showed there was no difference in test scores between public and parochial schools. As I was investing heavily on an erroneous assumption, I decided to investigate. As I recall, the original findings used an increase factor of 1.8 for public schools and they still didn&#8217;t measure up. I guess someone on the team did not like the results so they increased the multiplier to 2.5. Guess what, now they were the same. Take out the factor and public schools grossly underperformed. Could be the same research rubric is afoot in CEEP? I ain&#8217;t sayin, just pointing fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
